tubechallenge.com

Going Underground wrote:I would have had at least 10 GWR's had the system run to timetable.....

Prior to the 16:23 being set every full network I attempted was scheduled inside the current GWR.... As I am sure would have been the case for dozens and dozens of attempts by others.... It's the nature of the beast .....

What 16:23 record?

moley wrote:

Going Underground wrote:I would have had at least 10 GWR's had the system run to timetable.....

Prior to the 16:23 being set every full network I attempted was scheduled inside the current GWR.... As I am sure would have been the case for dozens and dozens of attempts by others.... It's the nature of the beast .....

What 16:23 record?

i think that was the theoretical time came up with!

Ah it's only 16:29 damn I would have tried harder had I known it was that soft on my last few attempts

Going Underground wrote:Ah it's only 16:29 damn I would have tried harder had I known it was that soft on my last few attempts

How many attempts have you done Kev? More than 21?

The Raven wrote:

Going Underground wrote:Ah it's only 16:29 damn I would have tried harder had I known it was that soft on my last few attempts

How many attempts have you done Kev? More than 21?

I think it's 17 or 18 Glen, I will check my books at home......

I would have done a lot more had the GWR time not come down so much and have pretty much reduced the attempts to charity or Tube Olympics now.... I haven't bothered with all the GWR criteria such as witness statements and photos etc for a couple of years now....

Did you enjoy your trip to the zoo, Tubeguru?

Let me guess - that comment is supposed to be in a different thread?

I think we need a new league table. "Times i would have had", and "Records I would have had", had the system all run perfectly ...

I claim three world records. Anyone want to raise that?

geofftech wrote:I think we need a new league table. "Times i would have had", and "Records I would have had", had the system all run perfectly ...

I claim three world records. Anyone want to raise that?

I claim 5 4 of them legit

No, this thread.

tubeguru wrote:Your suggestions have been taken on board by the committee, and a decision will be due after I've been out to look at some animals.

Ah, I see.