Page 1 of 3

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 10:37
by tubeguru
That should keep Andi happy ...

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 10:49
by al
Good work Geoff (and Jack) :)

I also never thought you could make an interesting video about a trip to a library, but it seems I was wrong :shock:

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 16:06
by palkanetoijala31
tubeguru wrote:That should keep Andi happy ...
Im no longer on Wikipedia I have been Banned But seriously a Well Done effort Geoff and it was interesting to See jack albeit wiv a pixalated face.

I hope it now keeps the CMLIMTC happy as he has now become quite quiet strangely.

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 17:13
by tubeguru
palkanetoijala31 wrote:Im no longer on Wikipedia
palkanetoijala31 wrote:he has now become quite quiet strangely.
Mystery solved.

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 17:21
by Garion
Well of course he's going to be quiet now. In his eyes, he hasnt got some idiot messing up his website.

(not saying you're an idiot, I know how these "look at me I know everything/this is mine" think lol)

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 18:01
by palkanetoijala31
garion24wales wrote:Well of course he's going to be quiet now. In his eyes, he hasnt got some idiot messing up his website.

(not saying you're an idiot, I know how these "look at me I know everything/this is mine" think lol)
My friend whom researched some of the previous books The quizmaster (former tube challenger) whom supplies you with a good zone 1 quiz every year spoke very cordially to him on email.I think he didnt understand a lot of things said to him and vice versa didnt understand his attitude to the page wasnt constructive they reached a mutual understanding of the way forward.The only thing he didnt get was an apology to myself from him which is still outstanding!

not saying that you dress up in women clothes but you do

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 19:10
by tubeguru
palkanetoijala31 wrote:The only thing he didnt get was an apology to myself from him which is still outstanding!
So whom owes who an apology here?

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 19:10
by Sam
You owe me an apology ;)

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 19:16
by Garion
not saying that you dress up in women clothes but you do
Prove it :)

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 20:40
by Root
The guru's posts in this thread so far have made me chuckle.

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 23:09
by palkanetoijala31
tubeguru wrote:
palkanetoijala31 wrote:The only thing he didnt get was an apology to myself from him which is still outstanding!
So whom owes who an apology here?
You owe me an apology lol

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 23:36
by palkanetoijala31
Strange how geoff does a sterling job updating a Wikipedia article for the better and cmlimtic just cant leave it alone for 1 second or even a day (just out of interest does Bob Robinson hold 8 or 6 records.)As long as the current version stays and hopefully improves by including those whom have broken record Ie Joy 54 for example and those from early 60,s i think that the wikipedia debate has been resolved (now all that leaves is my apology Cmlimtic personally.)

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 25 Jan 2011, 05:20
by Sam
Trouble is, if they haven't been printed in black and White then they cannot be included hence why neither of mine can be :(

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 25 Jan 2011, 09:37
by moley
palkanetoijala31 wrote:Strange how geoff does a sterling job updating a Wikipedia article for the better and cmlimtic just cant leave it alone for 1 second or even a day (just out of interest does Bob Robinson hold 8 or 6 records.)As long as the current version stays and hopefully improves by including those whom have broken record Ie Joy 54 for example and those from early 60,s i think that the wikipedia debate has been resolved (now all that leaves is my apology Cmlimtic personally.)
Chase Me is only doing his 'job' in tidying it up. He hasn't changed what was included.

Careful what you wish for...

Re: Previous records, all properly researched

Posted: 25 Jan 2011, 09:54
by Root
Sam wrote:Trouble is, if they haven't been printed in black and White then they cannot be included hence why neither of mine can be :(
That's not true; internet sources may or may not be considered reliable too. It depends on their nature: ie an internet forum is not reliable, a newspaper website is.