Re: Previous records, all properly researched
Posted: 24 Jan 2011, 10:37
That should keep Andi happy ...
Eleven lines - one record
http://www.tubechallenge.com/forum/
Im no longer on Wikipedia I have been Banned But seriously a Well Done effort Geoff and it was interesting to See jack albeit wiv a pixalated face.tubeguru wrote:That should keep Andi happy ...
palkanetoijala31 wrote:Im no longer on Wikipedia
Mystery solved.palkanetoijala31 wrote:he has now become quite quiet strangely.
My friend whom researched some of the previous books The quizmaster (former tube challenger) whom supplies you with a good zone 1 quiz every year spoke very cordially to him on email.I think he didnt understand a lot of things said to him and vice versa didnt understand his attitude to the page wasnt constructive they reached a mutual understanding of the way forward.The only thing he didnt get was an apology to myself from him which is still outstanding!garion24wales wrote:Well of course he's going to be quiet now. In his eyes, he hasnt got some idiot messing up his website.
(not saying you're an idiot, I know how these "look at me I know everything/this is mine" think lol)
So whom owes who an apology here?palkanetoijala31 wrote:The only thing he didnt get was an apology to myself from him which is still outstanding!
Prove itnot saying that you dress up in women clothes but you do
You owe me an apology loltubeguru wrote:So whom owes who an apology here?palkanetoijala31 wrote:The only thing he didnt get was an apology to myself from him which is still outstanding!
Chase Me is only doing his 'job' in tidying it up. He hasn't changed what was included.palkanetoijala31 wrote:Strange how geoff does a sterling job updating a Wikipedia article for the better and cmlimtic just cant leave it alone for 1 second or even a day (just out of interest does Bob Robinson hold 8 or 6 records.)As long as the current version stays and hopefully improves by including those whom have broken record Ie Joy 54 for example and those from early 60,s i think that the wikipedia debate has been resolved (now all that leaves is my apology Cmlimtic personally.)
That's not true; internet sources may or may not be considered reliable too. It depends on their nature: ie an internet forum is not reliable, a newspaper website is.Sam wrote:Trouble is, if they haven't been printed in black and White then they cannot be included hence why neither of mine can be