tubechallenge.com

Its official despite being the 4th recent record time although 2 of those i dont think will get confirmed now (5 if u count Perry Vale & rickmansworth group on tube olympics) under 17h 12m 43s

The New time to beat is 16h 44m 16s achieved by Martin hazel,Steve Wilson and Andi James on December 14th 2009.

Wrote this in November:

Wanstead wrote:If half of the most recent attempts are legit, we could be looking at a time of 17 hours flat before long.

palkanetoijala31 wrote:The New time to beat is 16h 44m 16s achieved by Martin hazel,Steve Wilson and Andi James on December 14th 2009.

Scratch that. I now postulate 16h 30m as lower bound on time.

palkanetoijala31 wrote:Its official despite being the 4th recent record time although 2 of those i dont think will get confirmed now (5 if u count Perry Vale & rickmansworth group on tube olympics) under 17h 12m 43s

I cannot get my head around that sentence.

Root wrote:

palkanetoijala31 wrote:Its official despite being the 4th recent record time although 2 of those i dont think will get confirmed now (5 if u count Perry Vale & rickmansworth group on tube olympics) under 17h 12m 43s

I cannot get my head around that sentence.

Ok Bouncingtigger 15.10.2010 17h 12m 28s (Solo Time set no independant witness name given to verify little evidence as of post time no evidence given in ? only Jay can let us know if this was successful)
Martha Jackson & Tim Roberts 17h 11m 05s (False time how on earth did we get ours claimed before there,s when its was over a month and half later and nobody knows whom they r)
Sam Cawley whom everybody knows will probably in the next few days say she got her record certificate but put her evidence in after us actually.
and Perry Vale & rickmansworth at least beat the official time on tube olympics

palkanetoijala31 wrote:

Root wrote:

palkanetoijala31 wrote:Its official despite being the 4th recent record time although 2 of those i dont think will get confirmed now (5 if u count Perry Vale & rickmansworth group on tube olympics) under 17h 12m 43s

I cannot get my head around that sentence.

Ok Bouncingtigger 15.10.2010 17h 12m 28s (Solo Time set no independant witness name given to verify little evidence as of post time no evidence given in ? only Jay can let us know if this was successful)
Martha Jackson & Tim Roberts 17h 11m 05s (False time how on earth did we get ours claimed before there,s when its was over a month and half later and nobody knows whom they r)
Sam Cawley whom everybody knows will probably in the next few days say she got her record certificate but put her evidence in after us actually.
and Perry Vale & rickmansworth at least beat the official time on tube olympics

There you go Olly - nothing could be clearer ...

***** wrote:It's on my site:

http://www.*****.co.uk/tube/others.html#current

any chance of another (newer) picture, Andi?

Yes, I have a group picture of the three of us (plus official stopwatch operator) when we finished at Heathrow T5

Dont forget now Geoff to add Sam Cawley to the list between the 2 times the others i think can be deleted but keep Jay,s for 1 month i say just to see if Guinness approve it.?

You're obsessed with this "false" time aren't you?

tubeguru wrote:You're obsessed with this "false" time aren't you?

Yep i want it expunged from the Records and Blaggards hung.

Why does it matter to you so much?

tubeguru wrote:Why does it matter to you so much?

I suppose it,s because i have put a lot of effort into obtaining 3 world records and have put my body through hell 25 times and really dont care if i never break it again i can look myself in the mirror and say i have done it!At least wiv ur good friend ******** time it was laughable by beating it 7h.I suppose i have got a bee in the bonnet over this and wont rest until i find the fantasy Blaggards and drag them round the tube by their hair in 17h 11m 05s

A couple of points spring to mind here.

First, why don't you let Guinness decide if their attempt is geniune? If Guinness confirm it, then they did it. If nothing is ever heard again then you needn't worry yourself. Even if it is documented somewhere, it's still not the fastest time because ... secondly, you put yourself though hell 25 times only to be beaten by a girl.

tubeguru wrote:secondly, you put yourself though hell 25 times only to be beaten by a girl.

Haha funny

garion24wales wrote:

tubeguru wrote:secondly, you put yourself though hell 25 times only to be beaten by a girl.

Haha funny

Sam would beat u up in half a second though Garion it took her 17h 02m to beat me up lol

I'm up for a challenge