Re: Grumbleweed Game Thread: Game X
Posted: 01 Nov 2016, 15:57
60 points
Eleven lines - one record
http://www.tubechallenge.com/forum/
how? I was ahead, then you stopped me. you don't get my points!GuyBarry wrote:Jolly good but I'm still in the lead...
No you weren't. I was 31 ahead, I lost 15 points, so I'm now 16 ahead. The scores are GB 136, TG 120, AC 36.Tube Geek wrote:how? I was ahead, then you stopped me. you don't get my points!GuyBarry wrote:Jolly good but I'm still in the lead...
I DON'T STEAL YOUR POINTS. THIS IS GRUMBLEWEED NOT NIMBLEWEED. I JUST STOPPED YOU GETTING THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GuyBarry wrote:No you weren't. I was 31 ahead, I lost 15 points, so I'm now 16 ahead. The scores are GB 136, TG 120, AC 36.Tube Geek wrote:how? I was ahead, then you stopped me. you don't get my points!GuyBarry wrote:Jolly good but I'm still in the lead...
What are you on about?Tube Geek wrote:I DON'T STEAL YOUR POINTS. THIS IS GRUMBLEWEED NOT NIMBLEWEED. I JUST STOPPED YOU GETTING THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GuyBarry wrote:No you weren't. I was 31 ahead, I lost 15 points, so I'm now 16 ahead. The scores are GB 136, TG 120, AC 36.Tube Geek wrote:how? I was ahead, then you stopped me. you don't get my points!GuyBarry wrote:Jolly good but I'm still in the lead...
[boldface added by me for clarity - I haven't changed the words]Tube Geek wrote: (2) If the time difference between a claim for X points and the next post in the thread is X minutes or more, the player gains X points. If the time difference is less than X minutes, the player loses X points.
Looks reasonable to me as well. Tube Geek must have had a sudden brainstorm. Anyway:A Challenge wrote:Looks reasonable, to me!
To which Tube Geek replied "Lol". He clearly didn't object to losing points on that occasion!GuyBarry wrote:No, you haven't scored any points at all this morning. Your claim at 06:02 was invalid because you made the previous valid claim (at 19:29 yesterday). And your spoiler at 07:15 lost TG 34 points rather than scoring them for you. Remember this is Grumbleweed, not Nimbleweed!A Challenge wrote:
That's 85 for me so far this morning.
LolGuyBarry wrote:Just to drive the point home, this is a comment from Grumbleweed IX:
To which Tube Geek replied "Lol". He clearly didn't object to losing points on that occasion!GuyBarry wrote:No, you haven't scored any points at all this morning. Your claim at 06:02 was invalid because you made the previous valid claim (at 19:29 yesterday). And your spoiler at 07:15 lost TG 34 points rather than scoring them for you. Remember this is Grumbleweed, not Nimbleweed!A Challenge wrote:
That's 85 for me so far this morning.