tubechallenge.com

Oops, sorry

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

DavidC wrote:The scores are based on the claims made during the period, not the hours during the period that are being claimed. The first claim on Sunday 14th referenced a longer period from Saturday 13th than the dead time and the left to carry forward into the next period after the last claim on Saturday 20th.

I did say don't, but it seems that Tube Geek has got his maths wrong, 675 is 9 Bells, which I am surprised at, as I claimed 16 Bells at 06:00, meaning there was 10 Bells excess, or I made a mistake!

A Challenge wrote:

DavidC wrote:The scores are based on the claims made during the period, not the hours during the period that are being claimed. The first claim on Sunday 14th referenced a longer period from Saturday 13th than the dead time and the left to carry forward into the next period after the last claim on Saturday 20th.

I did say don't, but it seems that Tube Geek has got his maths wrong, 675 is 9 Bells, which I am surprised at, as I claimed 16 Bells at 06:00, meaning there was 10 Bells excess, or I made a mistake!

Sorry, i did get my maths wrong. but does that mean i was right first time then?

Tube Geek wrote:

A Challenge wrote:

DavidC wrote:The scores are based on the claims made during the period, not the hours during the period that are being claimed. The first claim on Sunday 14th referenced a longer period from Saturday 13th than the dead time and the left to carry forward into the next period after the last claim on Saturday 20th.

I did say don't, but it seems that Tube Geek has got his maths wrong, 675 is 9 Bells, which I am surprised at, as I claimed 16 Bells at 06:00, meaning there was 10 Bells excess, or I made a mistake!

Sorry, i did get my maths wrong. but does that mean i was right first time then?

No, as the amount of 'dead time' plus unclaimed time at the week comes to less than the ten bell 'excess' coming in as unclaimed time at the previous week.

Iain wrote:ffs, the time on the previous post changed when I logged in

And that makes a difference because? That was an invalid spoiler!

A Challenge wrote:

Iain wrote:ffs, the time on the previous post changed when I logged in

And that makes a difference because? That was an invalid spoiler!

It was an invalid claim, followed by a spoiler, which you lose 15 bells worth of points!

(Copied and pasted from the rules section)
If a player makes two or more spoiler posts in a row, then only the first spoiler will reset the clock. All consecutive spoilers by that player will be ignored and have no effect on the clock.

Invalid points claims are NOT counted as spoilers. Typos made when claiming for weeds or bells are counted as spoilers, so "40 weef", or "2 bellsd" are SPOILERS, and not invalid claims. Note that a "typo" refers to the mis-spelling of the non-numeric part of a claim. If a player accidentally types "30 weed" instead of "20 weed" when only 20 weed are available then it will be counted as an invalid claim.

Tube Geek wrote:

A Challenge wrote:

Iain wrote:ffs, the time on the previous post changed when I logged in

And that makes a difference because? That was an invalid spoiler!

It was an invalid claim, followed by a spoiler, which you lose 15 bells worth of points!

(Copied and pasted from the rules section)
If a player makes two or more spoiler posts in a row, then only the first spoiler will reset the clock. All consecutive spoilers by that player will be ignored and have no effect on the clock.

Invalid points claims are NOT counted as spoilers. Typos made when claiming for weeds or bells are counted as spoilers, so "40 weef", or "2 bellsd" are SPOILERS, and not invalid claims. Note that a "typo" refers to the mis-spelling of the non-numeric part of a claim. If a player accidentally types "30 weed" instead of "20 weed" when only 20 weed are available then it will be counted as an invalid claim.

the spoiler didn't reset!

A Challenge wrote:

Tube Geek wrote:

A Challenge wrote:

Iain wrote:ffs, the time on the previous post changed when I logged in

And that makes a difference because? That was an invalid spoiler!

It was an invalid claim, followed by a spoiler, which you lose 15 bells worth of points!

(Copied and pasted from the rules section)
If a player makes two or more spoiler posts in a row, then only the first spoiler will reset the clock. All consecutive spoilers by that player will be ignored and have no effect on the clock.

Invalid points claims are NOT counted as spoilers. Typos made when claiming for weeds or bells are counted as spoilers, so "40 weef", or "2 bellsd" are SPOILERS, and not invalid claims. Note that a "typo" refers to the mis-spelling of the non-numeric part of a claim. If a player accidentally types "30 weed" instead of "20 weed" when only 20 weed are available then it will be counted as an invalid claim.

the spoiler didn't reset!

Why not?

Tube Geek wrote:

A Challenge wrote:

Tube Geek wrote:

A Challenge wrote:

Iain wrote:ffs, the time on the previous post changed when I logged in

And that makes a difference because? That was an invalid spoiler!

It was an invalid claim, followed by a spoiler, which you lose 15 bells worth of points!

(Copied and pasted from the rules section)
If a player makes two or more spoiler posts in a row, then only the first spoiler will reset the clock. All consecutive spoilers by that player will be ignored and have no effect on the clock.

Invalid points claims are NOT counted as spoilers. Typos made when claiming for weeds or bells are counted as spoilers, so "40 weef", or "2 bellsd" are SPOILERS, and not invalid claims. Note that a "typo" refers to the mis-spelling of the non-numeric part of a claim. If a player accidentally types "30 weed" instead of "20 weed" when only 20 weed are available then it will be counted as an invalid claim.

the spoiler didn't reset!

Why not?

There was an invalid claim first, so it doesn't reset, as there had already been a claim.

Scores to 27th August 2016 at 23:59 with weekly figures in italics, overall in bold.

DavidC 0 100000
moley 0 96425
A Challenge 2025 89280
Going Und. 2025 86255
xcooler123 3375 76305
michael_c. 0 53650
Tube Geek 975 38610
leamfarrar 0 18750
The muleteer 0 10885
Iain -300 8400
The Raven 0 3845
Garion 0 2940
h. traveller 0 675
tractakid 0 35
palkan...31 0 -600
tubeguru 0 -44400

Xcooler123 scored highest this week, for the second week in a row. The total points scored this week is 8,100 (including 2775 Points of negatives), which is 64.286% of the total points claimable.

Scores to 3rd September 2016 at 23:59 with weekly figures in italics, overall in bold.

DavidC 0 100000
moley 0 96425
A Challenge 2850 92130
Going Und. 3450 89705
xcooler123 2475 78780
michael_c. 0 53650
Tube Geek 0 38610
leamfarrar 0 18750
Iain 3300 11700
The muleteer 0 10885
The Raven 0 3845
Garion 0 2940
h. traveller 0 675
tractakid 0 35
palkan...31 0 -600
tubeguru 0 -44400

Iain overtook The Muleteer this week, and I am not late with this change!

Going Underground scored highest this week, for the first week in a row. The total points scored this week is 12,075, which is 95.833% of the total points claimable.

Scores to 10th September 2016 at 23:59 with weekly figures in italics, overall in bold.

DavidC 0 100000
moley 0 96425
A Challenge 3300 96425
Going Und. 1875 91580
xcooler123 2925 81705
michael_c. 0 53650
Tube Geek 675 39285
leamfarrar 0 18750
Iain 1800 13500
The muleteer 0 10885
The Raven 0 3845
Garion 0 2940
h. traveller 0 675
tractakid 0 35
palkan...31 0 -600
tubeguru 0 -44400

I (A Challenge) scored highest this week, for the first week in a row. The total points scored this week is 10,575 (including my -825), which is 83.929% of the total points claimable.

I am currently unable to post the scores as I have no WiFi after the lightening storm on Thursday night, and can only post on Mobile Data, so not the scores, which have to be done on my computer!

Hi. Just wondering if there is a timescale for the next scores update - thanks.

DavidC wrote:Hi. Just wondering if there is a timescale for the next scores update - thanks.

Sorry - they are ready, but they aren't up! I hope to have the next week up today.