tubechallenge.com

Not one of his friends (I'm 11!), but watch his videos and follow him (not with an account) on Twitter, so know about his Penge obsession! Mind you, he does live there!

Tube Geek - why are all your posts in the game thread in red?

I like the colour red, and no one else posts them in a different colour to black, so I thought I would. I can do them in black though, if you want me to

I don't mind; I was just wondering.

If only life stopped for Tumbleweed. Yes, I have been extremely busy recently! <Still behind>

Scores to 26th March 2016 at 23:59 with weekly figures in italics, overall in bold.

DavidC 0 100000
moley 600 89825
Going Und. -975 39905
A Challenge 0 37360
michael_c. 2100 28075
leamfarrar -375 15375
xcooler123 4275 13080
The muleteer 0 10885
The Raven 0 3845
Garion 0 2265
Iain 675 1725
h. traveller 0 375
tractakid 0 35
tubeguru 0 -44400


Xcooler123 has moved up the table (demoting The muleteer) (also Iain who should have moved already), while xcooler123 scored highest this week for the second week in a row. The total points scored this week is 5,625, which is only 44.643% of the total points claimable.

I apologize for not posting these scores although they have been ready to be posted. There are also more weeks I will hopefully get online this morning!

[If only life stopped for Tumbleweed. Yes, I have been extremely busy recently! <Still behind>

Scores to 2nd April 2016 at 23:59 with weekly figures in italics, overall in bold.

DavidC 0 100000
moley 1425 91250
Going Und. 2250 42155
A Challenge 0 37360
michael_c. 2475 30550
leamfarrar -675 17175
xcooler123 4275 13080
The muleteer 0 10885
The Raven 0 3845
Garion 0 2265
Iain 675 1725
h. traveller 0 375
tractakid 0 35
Tube Geek -285 -285
tubeguru 0 -44400


I welcome to Tumbleweed Tube Geek, and apologize how far behind the scoring is. Your time here started badly, with half of your four posts invalid!

Michael_churchill scored highest this week for the first week in a row. The total points scored this week is 10,200, (Including, as I forgot to say before negatives) which is only 80.952% of the total points claimable.

If only life stopped for Tumbleweed. Yes, I have been extremely busy recently! <Still behind>

Scores to 9th April 2016 at 23:59 with weekly figures in italics, overall in bold.

DavidC 0 100000
moley 2850 94100
Going Und. 2400 44555
A Challenge 0 37360
michael_c. 0 30550
leamfarrar -1125 17175
xcooler123 2400 17730
The muleteer 0 10885
The Raven 0 3845
Garion 0 2265
Iain -450 1950
Tube Geek 1545 1260
h. traveller 0 375
tractakid 0 35
tubeguru 0 -44400

Tube Geek, you have moved twice up the table this week (demoting tractakid and hopeful traveller), and got your score positive. Well done! Could you please refrain from posting Clangs (to everybody) as it makes scoring difficult. Could the rules be changed please?

Moley scored highest this week for the first week in a row. The total points scored this week is 8,775, (Including Iain's and Tube Geek's negative scores) which is only 69.643% of the total points claimable.

A Challenge wrote:If only life stopped for Tumbleweed. Yes, I have been extremely busy recently! <Still behind>

Scores to 9th April 2016 at 23:59 with weekly figures in italics, overall in bold.

DavidC 0 100000
moley 2850 94100
Going Und. 2400 44555
A Challenge 0 37360
michael_c. 0 30550
leamfarrar -1125 17175
xcooler123 2400 17730
The muleteer 0 10885
The Raven 0 3845
Garion 0 2265
Iain -450 1950
Tube Geek 1545 1260
h. traveller 0 375
tractakid 0 35
tubeguru 0 -44400

Tube Geek, you have moved twice up the table this week (demoting tractakid and hopeful traveller), and got your score positive. Well done! Could you please refrain from posting Clangs (to everybody) as it makes scoring difficult. Could the rules be changed please?

Moley scored highest this week for the first week in a row. The total points scored this week is 8,775, (Including Iain's and Tube Geek's negative scores) which is only 69.643% of the total points claimable.

Ik, I won't post any more clangs! Also, on the first scores with me in, you mention hiw half were invalid. Why?

Tube Geek wrote:

A Challenge wrote:If only life stopped for Tumbleweed. Yes, I have been extremely busy recently! <Still behind>

Scores to 9th April 2016 at 23:59 with weekly figures in italics, overall in bold.

DavidC 0 100000
moley 2850 94100
Going Und. 2400 44555
A Challenge 0 37360
michael_c. 0 30550
leamfarrar -1125 17175
xcooler123 2400 17730
The muleteer 0 10885
The Raven 0 3845
Garion 0 2265
Iain -450 1950
Tube Geek 1545 1260
h. traveller 0 375
tractakid 0 35
tubeguru 0 -44400

Tube Geek, you have moved twice up the table this week (demoting tractakid and hopeful traveller), and got your score positive. Well done! Could you please refrain from posting Clangs (to everybody) as it makes scoring difficult. Could the rules be changed please?

Moley scored highest this week for the first week in a row. The total points scored this week is 8,775, (Including Iain's and Tube Geek's negative scores) which is only 69.643% of the total points claimable.

Ik, I won't post any more clangs! Also, on the first scores with me in, you mention hiw half were invalid. Why?

Moley GU leamfarrar Iain Tube G
xcooler123 31/03/2016 23:55-- 8 bells Valid 600
Iain 01/04/2016 08:56-- 9 bells Valid 675
Tube Geek 01/04/2016 10:13-- 2 bells Invalid -150
G. Under. 01/04/2016 17:14-- 7 bells Valid 525
Tube Geek 01/04/2016 20:11-- 4 bells Invalid -300
leamfarrar 02/04/2016 05:11-- 9 bells Valid 675
Tube Geek 02/04/2016 06:45-- 1 bell Valid 75
moley 02/04/2016 16:12-- 9 bells Valid 675
Tube Geek 02/04/2016 17:45-- 90 weed Valid 90


The Table hasn't worked! sorry! *I can send you the file if you want!

Via a PM? If so, yes please!

Tube Geek wrote:Via a PM? If so, yes please!

I don't think I can in a PM, but I could by Email if you want that. Anyway, if I explain it as:

Your first post was at 10:13, 1 hour and 17 minutes after the previous post at 08:56, and was 2 bells, meaning that two hours need to have past, which they hadn't.
Your second post was later that day at 20:11, 3 hours and 57 minutes after the previous post at 17:14, and was 4 bells, meaning that four hours need to have past, which they hadn't.

Anybody else who needs a breakdown like this, I can do it for other posts.

Right - get it now. Thanks!

If only life stopped for Tumbleweed. Yes, I have been extremely busy recently! <NOW CAUGHT UP>

Scores to 16th April 2016 at 23:59 with weekly figures in italics, overall in bold.

DavidC 0 100000
moley 0 94100
Going Und. 2250 46805
A Challenge 0 37360
michael_c. 2925 33475
xcooler123 2100 19830
leamfarrar 450 18750
The muleteer 0 10885
The Raven 0 3845
Tube Geek 2175 3435
Garion 0 2265
Iain 0 1950
h. traveller 0 375
tractakid 0 35
tubeguru 0 -44400

Tube Geek, you have moved twice up the table this week (demoting Garion and Iain).

Michael_churchill scored highest this week for the first week in a row. The total points scored this week is 7,725, (Including Tube Geek's negative scores) which is only 61.310% of the total points claimable. Why has this fallen?

Horray! I am up to date!

It's better than the 26th of March, which was only 44%!

Going Underground wrote:half a dozen Bells

This is invalid as it is a 'Mathmatical Construct' and so under the rules as a value (6) can be given to 'Half a dozen' that is -6.