tubechallenge.com

Scores to 19th December 2015 at 23:59 with weekly figures in italics, overall in bold.

DavidC 5025 68200
moley 1425 49250
Going Und. 975 26855
A Challenge 1425 19465
The muleteer 0 10885
leamfarrar 750 8425
michael_c. 2550 2550
Garion 0 1740
The Raven 0 450
h. traveller 0 375
tractakid 0 18
tubeguru 0 -44400

Everyone who did actually post, and got a positive score (except Going Underground), scored over 1000. DavidC scored highest this week alone, for the fourth week in a row.

I welcome to Tumbleweed michael_churchill, who enters the leaderboard in 7th place.

DavidC is currently on exactly 70,000 points in Tumbleweed. Just thought I'd mention it.

tractakid wrote:III weed

???

DavidC is currently on exactly 70,000 points in Tumbleweed. Just thought I'd mention it

Thank you for mentioning it !

tractakid wrote:

A Challenge wrote:

tractakid wrote:III weed

???

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_numerals

It is still invalid to post 3, and that (-3) is what I put in the spreadsheet when I updated it this afternoon for you. At least I realised that it wasn't 111!

Scores to 26th December 2015 at 23:59 with weekly figures in italics, overall in bold.

DavidC 3900 72100
moley 3000 52250
Going Und. 1200 28055
A Challenge 525 19990
The muleteer 0 10885
leamfarrar 1725 10200
michael_c. 1125 3675
Garion 0 1740
The Raven 0 450
h. traveller 0 375
tractakid -3 15
tubeguru 0 -44400

Everyone who did actually post, and got a positive score (except me [A Challenge]), scored over 1000. DavidC scored highest this week alone, for the fifth week in a row.

Last weekly scores of the year! I may post a midweek update to 31st if that is wanted, though. Comments?

Scores to 2nd January 2016 at 23:59 with weekly figures in italics, overall in bold.

DavidC 3300 75400
moley 2925 55175
Going Und. 1725 29780
A Challenge 3030 23020
leamfarrar 1950 12150
The muleteer 0 10885
michael_c. 0 3675
Garion 0 1740
The Raven 0 450
h. traveller 0 375
tractakid 0 15
tubeguru 0 -44400



Everyone who did actually post scored over 1500. DavidC scored highest this week alone, for the sixth week in a row. Total point scored this week is 12,390, which is 102.6% of the total points claimable as there was 13 bells claimed (valid) before 9 o'clock last Sunday.

Do we play to the second of the post - or just the minute?

A Challenge - can you confirm how you are scoring this? Thanks

Sorry for a silly question, moley, but where are the seconds shown ? Thanks.

Maybe it's just my view that shows seconds! You can change it in your settings where you choose your time zone.

Imdirectly that answers my question.

Yes - mine just showed HH:MM. I have just changed mine using the Custom option from "d M Y, H:i" to "d M Y, H:i:s" after delving into the fascinating write-up on the parameter values (including their case-sensitive nature) !

DavidC wrote:Yes - mine just showed HH:MM. I have just changed mine using the Custom option from "d M Y, H:i" to "d M Y, H:i:s" after delving into the fascinating write-up on the parameter values (including their case-sensitive nature) !

I don't have seconds on my user though if that is how to do it then I might do it and be a bit stricter. Hower, in the rules, it says nothing, and the closest I can find is that:

tubeguru wrote:4. Multiple claims at the same time

If two or more claims are made at the same time (that is, they have the same timestamp on them), the first valid claim will get the points claimed. The remaining claims will simply be ignored and the clock will be reset as usual. If the first claim in post order is invalid, then that player will have points deducted, and the next valid claim in post order will get the points, and so on.

The reason why I note this is that claims at the same time are not counted with negative points and if we play to the second then not getting negative points would be a lot more unfair as posting to the second of another post that is at the same time will be hard, and the points would be deducted.

Also the scoresheet would need to be adapted slightly and the old posts would end up being all on zero seconds, so this idea would probably need to have a score reset.

A Challenge wrote:Scores to 2nd January 2016 at 23:59 with weekly figures in italics, overall in bold.

leamfarrar 1950 12150

Everyone who did actually post scored over 1500. DavidC scored highest this week alone, for the sixth week in a row. Total point scored this week is 12,390, which is 102.6% of the total points claimable as there was 13 bells claimed (valid) before 9 o'clock last Sunday.

The last post I counted last week was leamfarrar's post 03/01/2015 06:18 as it had happened before the score update. this means that the total points scored is 12,180, which is actually 99.67% of total points claimable. The logic behind what had happened still works, though. What it should be is in quotes below, including leamfarrar's new score and the correct overall points.

A Challenge wrote:Scores to 2nd January 2016 at 23:59 with weekly figures in italics, overall in bold.

DavidC 3300 75400
moley 2925 55175
Going Und. 1725 29780
A Challenge 3030 23020
leamfarrar 1200 11400
The muleteer 0 10885
michael_c. 0 3675
Garion 0 1740
The Raven 0 450
h. traveller 0 375
tractakid 0 15
tubeguru 0 -44400



Everyone who did actually post scored over 1500. DavidC scored highest this week alone, for the sixth week in a row. Total point scored this week is 12,180, which is 96.67% of the total points claimable.

A Challenge wrote:...this idea would probably need to have a score reset.

Fine by me

Incidentally, under the seconds approach, you were five seconds early with your 90 weeds claim tonight ...

DavidC wrote:

A Challenge wrote:...this idea would probably need to have a score reset.

Fine by me

Incidentally, under the seconds approach, you were five seconds early with your 90 weeds claim tonight ...

5 seconds? Who cares, we are playing to the minute and I got it in in the same minute even though it wad 5 seconds early. Also, I am playing (and scoring) to the accuracy of to the minute because I can't find the to the second in the User Control Panel.

A score reset! What do the other players think about having a score reset?