Re: Counting - discussion thread
Posted: 17 Jan 2014, 14:39
Well you're very good at quoting the SABRE Wiki (of which I wrote a not inconsiderable amount!).RobbieM wrote:Aren't I knowledgeable?
Eleven lines - one record
http://www.tubechallenge.com/forum/
Well you're very good at quoting the SABRE Wiki (of which I wrote a not inconsiderable amount!).RobbieM wrote:Aren't I knowledgeable?
That's really quite surprising - not about that particular number, but that the pattern of numbers with that property is so irregular.DrainBrain wrote:You cannot add a palindromic number to 1074 and obtain another palindromic number: http://oeis.org/A084843
Don't give away your route secrets!! You have no concept of privacyRobbieM wrote:During a full network challenge, for some strange reason, you decide to run from Upminster to Wanstead. Your route takes you through Ilford, along the A1083.
The Orange One wrote:Don't give away your route secrets!! You have no concept of privacyRobbieM wrote:During a full network challenge, for some strange reason, you decide to run from Upminster to Wanstead. Your route takes you through Ilford, along the A1083.now I can break that elusive 6 hour barrier.
Pipped at the post! I looked to see what it had to say about Twerton, the district of Bath where I currently live: "Nigel de Gournai and Geoffrey Malregard from Bishop of Coutances. 4 mills. 4 cobs, 17 cattle, 35 pigs, 400 sheep". I doubt whether William the Conqueror would recognize it nowDrainBrain wrote:The first draft of the Domesday Book was completed in 1086.
This isn't quite right. It should begin "Take any three-digit number that isn't a palindrome. Write it backwards. Take away the smaller from the larger..." [etc.]RobbieM wrote:Take any 3-digit number. Then make an anagram of it. Take away the smaller from the larger. You usually end up with another three digit number. (If you don't, then put a 'zero' before the two digits to effectively make it three digits.)
Take this new number, and below it, write the number backwards. Then add the two together.
Your answer should be 1089.
I can certainly bear it in mind - just in case I get sacked soon...GuyBarry wrote:I don't suppose RobbieM's looking for a job at the moment, but there's a vacancy for a Customer Service Assistant with BP in Guildford - reference number 1094.
Not true!GuyBarry wrote:[I don't think a single Tube-related fact has ever been posted on this thread! Now there's a challenge...]TC95 wrote:[thanks! After tagging along with the Team Rhys for the Tube Olympics R15 I thought it would be a good time to put my Tube knowledge to good practical use]
St Anselm of Canterbury, who developed the so-called "ontological argument" for the existence of God, died in AD 1109.
I stand corrected! Although I don't really think the last one qualifiesThe Orange One wrote: - From myself: British Rail Class 483 is another name for the 1938 Tube Stock trains, which last ran the Tube on the Northern line in 1988. They now run on the Isle of Wight.
- From greatkingrat: Pantone 485 is the colour of the Central line on the underground map.
- From Brock: Thanks. I'm afraid I don't have anything interesting to say about the number 539, except that it's the total number of stations you'd visit in two Tube Challenges. If you left one out the first time
- From RobbieM: During a full network challenge, for some strange reason, you decide to run from Upminster to Wanstead. Your route takes you through Ilford, along the A1083.
I can write it with 23 letters: "eleven hundred and fifteen".DrainBrain wrote:One thousand one hundred and fifteen is the smallest integer requiring 31 letters to write in English.