
Counting - discussion thread
- RobbieM
- All Zones
- Posts: 2748
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 21:14
- Location: Guildford
Re: Counting - discussion thread
I think we got away with it... 

Personal record: 270 Stations in 9 minutes and 3 seconds
- tubeguru
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 9190
- Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 22:08
- Location: The Twilight Zone
- Contact:
Re: Counting - discussion thread
Whatever.
One thing only do I know, and that is that I know nothing - Socrates.
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2025
Member of sweet FA
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2025
Member of sweet FA
- tractakid
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 3350
- Joined: 15 Nov 2011, 20:04
- Location: Milton Keynes
Re: Counting - discussion thread
678*4=/=5678
*insert boasting about notable tube accomplishments here*
- tubeguru
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 9190
- Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 22:08
- Location: The Twilight Zone
- Contact:
Re: Counting - discussion thread
Whatever.
One thing only do I know, and that is that I know nothing - Socrates.
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2025
Member of sweet FA
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2025
Member of sweet FA
-
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 5480
- Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24
Re: Counting - discussion thread
I think tubeguru was perfectly OK with that one. He said it's three-quarters of the title, not three-quarters of the number.
Or perhaps there's some obscure Steps single called "904" that I'm unaware of
Or perhaps there's some obscure Steps single called "904" that I'm unaware of

Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
- tubeguru
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 9190
- Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 22:08
- Location: The Twilight Zone
- Contact:
Re: Counting - discussion thread
Yeah, I'm saving that one for when we get to 904.
One thing only do I know, and that is that I know nothing - Socrates.
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2025
Member of sweet FA
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2025
Member of sweet FA
-
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 5480
- Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24
Re: Counting - discussion thread
DrainBrain wrote:The 684th Fibonacci number is divisible by 684.
It appears to be:tubeguru wrote:Feel free to tell us what it actually is ...
39633363350150665433335490556348985189574179795039333969368895830540407820581547578204201061028307874718885735558275776690548029037838240694288
I haven't checked for divisibility by 684 though.
EDIT: sorry, this formatting has cut the last three digits off the number. It actually ends ...694288.
EDIT[2]: this site gives prime factorizations of all the Fibonacci numbers up to the 1000th. The factorization of the 684th number begins 2^4 * 3^3 * 17 * 19^2..., and 684 = 2^2 * 3^2 * 19, so DrainBrain is definitely right. No idea where he got the information from though!
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
- RobbieM
- All Zones
- Posts: 2748
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 21:14
- Location: Guildford
Re: Counting - discussion thread
Wow. Have you memorised it? I ran out of memorising Fibonnaci numbers after 1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89 ... that's it; I have to add them in my head now.
Personal record: 270 Stations in 9 minutes and 3 seconds
-
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 5480
- Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24
Re: Counting - discussion thread
No, of course not! You can get the values of Fibonacci numbers from the Fibonacci calculator.RobbieM wrote:Wow. Have you memorised it?
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
- RobbieM
- All Zones
- Posts: 2748
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 21:14
- Location: Guildford
Re: Counting - discussion thread
And what you may not know is, that I was once a lodger in the house of Dr R.Knott in1994/5!GuyBarry wrote:No, of course not! You can get the values of Fibonacci numbers from the Fibonacci calculator.RobbieM wrote:Wow. Have you memorised it?
Personal record: 270 Stations in 9 minutes and 3 seconds
-
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 5480
- Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24
Re: Counting - discussion thread
Not according to the list I cited earlier, which gives "coNWy valley" - weird one though!RobbieM wrote:690 - the last three digits of the STD code for Betws-y-Coed. That's a nice sounding place. I guess the digits may represent NW - North Wales, though I haven't checked.
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
-
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 5480
- Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24
Re: Counting - discussion thread
Having said that, I'll be impressed if you know where the A700 is off the top of your head. I have walked its entire length, which is nothing like as impressive as it sounds...I'm not turning the thread into a list of road numbers!
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
-
- Zone 6
- Posts: 975
- Joined: 04 Jun 2013, 10:42
- Location: South of the Thames
Re: Counting - discussion thread
Apologies for not providing a link re the 684th Fibonacci number. The source was OEIS which includes a sequence of nth Fibonacci numbers that are divisible by n: http://oeis.org/A023172
Because the number is over 140 decimal digits I didn't bother posting it.
Because the number is over 140 decimal digits I didn't bother posting it.
Royal Oak to Bethnal Green in 333 days
Heathrow Terminal 4 to Amersham in 17 hours, 42 minutes and 22 seconds
Heathrow Terminal 4 to Amersham in 17 hours, 42 minutes and 22 seconds
-
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 5480
- Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24
Re: Counting - discussion thread
Ah yes, the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences - ultimate bible for anyone interested in the properties of the natural numbers. I came across it a few years ago and was amazed to discover that such a thing existed. A couple of years ago the BBC programme QI said that 12407 was the "smallest uninteresting number" because at the time it was the smallest number that didn't appear in the OEIS. (I'm not sure what it is now - it was 13794 for a while, but I think that appears now.) Of course, the smallest uninteresting number is by definition interesting, giving rise to the well-known interesting number paradox.
Which means that the counting game should keep going for quite a while yet
Which means that the counting game should keep going for quite a while yet

Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
- RobbieM
- All Zones
- Posts: 2748
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 21:14
- Location: Guildford
Re: Counting - discussion thread
Ah yes, how long do you think it'll take us to get to 12,407?
Personal record: 270 Stations in 9 minutes and 3 seconds
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests