Counting - discussion thread

Games that go on and on and on and on and on and on and and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on (and on)
Post Reply
User avatar
RobbieM
All Zones
Posts: 2748
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 21:14
Location: Guildford

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by RobbieM »

I think we got away with it... :o
User avatar
tubeguru
Site Administrator
Posts: 9190
Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 22:08
Location: The Twilight Zone
Contact:

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by tubeguru »

Whatever.
One thing only do I know, and that is that I know nothing - Socrates.

Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2025
Member of sweet FA
User avatar
tractakid
The Twilight Zone
Posts: 3350
Joined: 15 Nov 2011, 20:04
Location: Milton Keynes

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by tractakid »

678*4=/=5678
*insert boasting about notable tube accomplishments here*
User avatar
tubeguru
Site Administrator
Posts: 9190
Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 22:08
Location: The Twilight Zone
Contact:

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by tubeguru »

Whatever.
One thing only do I know, and that is that I know nothing - Socrates.

Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2025
Member of sweet FA
GuyBarry
The Twilight Zone
Posts: 5480
Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by GuyBarry »

I think tubeguru was perfectly OK with that one. He said it's three-quarters of the title, not three-quarters of the number.

Or perhaps there's some obscure Steps single called "904" that I'm unaware of :)
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015

Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
User avatar
tubeguru
Site Administrator
Posts: 9190
Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 22:08
Location: The Twilight Zone
Contact:

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by tubeguru »

Yeah, I'm saving that one for when we get to 904.
One thing only do I know, and that is that I know nothing - Socrates.

Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2025
Member of sweet FA
GuyBarry
The Twilight Zone
Posts: 5480
Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by GuyBarry »

DrainBrain wrote:The 684th Fibonacci number is divisible by 684.
tubeguru wrote:Feel free to tell us what it actually is ...
It appears to be:

39633363350150665433335490556348985189574179795039333969368895830540407820581547578204201061028307874718885735558275776690548029037838240694288

I haven't checked for divisibility by 684 though.

EDIT: sorry, this formatting has cut the last three digits off the number. It actually ends ...694288.

EDIT[2]: this site gives prime factorizations of all the Fibonacci numbers up to the 1000th. The factorization of the 684th number begins 2^4 * 3^3 * 17 * 19^2..., and 684 = 2^2 * 3^2 * 19, so DrainBrain is definitely right. No idea where he got the information from though!
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015

Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
User avatar
RobbieM
All Zones
Posts: 2748
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 21:14
Location: Guildford

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by RobbieM »

Wow. Have you memorised it? I ran out of memorising Fibonnaci numbers after 1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89 ... that's it; I have to add them in my head now.
GuyBarry
The Twilight Zone
Posts: 5480
Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by GuyBarry »

RobbieM wrote:Wow. Have you memorised it?
No, of course not! You can get the values of Fibonacci numbers from the Fibonacci calculator.
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015

Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
User avatar
RobbieM
All Zones
Posts: 2748
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 21:14
Location: Guildford

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by RobbieM »

GuyBarry wrote:
RobbieM wrote:Wow. Have you memorised it?
No, of course not! You can get the values of Fibonacci numbers from the Fibonacci calculator.
And what you may not know is, that I was once a lodger in the house of Dr R.Knott in1994/5!
GuyBarry
The Twilight Zone
Posts: 5480
Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by GuyBarry »

RobbieM wrote:690 - the last three digits of the STD code for Betws-y-Coed. That's a nice sounding place. I guess the digits may represent NW - North Wales, though I haven't checked.
Not according to the list I cited earlier, which gives "coNWy valley" - weird one though!
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015

Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
GuyBarry
The Twilight Zone
Posts: 5480
Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by GuyBarry »

I'm not turning the thread into a list of road numbers!
Having said that, I'll be impressed if you know where the A700 is off the top of your head. I have walked its entire length, which is nothing like as impressive as it sounds...
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015

Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
DrainBrain
Zone 6
Posts: 975
Joined: 04 Jun 2013, 10:42
Location: South of the Thames

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by DrainBrain »

Apologies for not providing a link re the 684th Fibonacci number. The source was OEIS which includes a sequence of nth Fibonacci numbers that are divisible by n: http://oeis.org/A023172

Because the number is over 140 decimal digits I didn't bother posting it.
Royal Oak to Bethnal Green in 333 days
Heathrow Terminal 4 to Amersham in 17 hours, 42 minutes and 22 seconds
GuyBarry
The Twilight Zone
Posts: 5480
Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by GuyBarry »

Ah yes, the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences - ultimate bible for anyone interested in the properties of the natural numbers. I came across it a few years ago and was amazed to discover that such a thing existed. A couple of years ago the BBC programme QI said that 12407 was the "smallest uninteresting number" because at the time it was the smallest number that didn't appear in the OEIS. (I'm not sure what it is now - it was 13794 for a while, but I think that appears now.) Of course, the smallest uninteresting number is by definition interesting, giving rise to the well-known interesting number paradox.

Which means that the counting game should keep going for quite a while yet :)
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015

Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
User avatar
RobbieM
All Zones
Posts: 2748
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 21:14
Location: Guildford

Re: Counting - discussion thread

Post by RobbieM »

Ah yes, how long do you think it'll take us to get to 12,407?
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests