Naming of lines
-
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 5464
- Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24
Naming of lines
It occurs to me that almost all Tube lines are really badly named. The names may have made sense historically, but nowadays hardly any of them describe what the line does.
Metropolitan - goes right out into the suburbs and further into Buckinghamshire.
Central - extends far beyond central London, to Essex in one direction and into suburban west London in the other direction.
Circle - no longer runs in a circle.
Northern - extends further south than any other Tube line.
Hammersmith & City - one end is indeed at Hammersmith, but the other isn't in the City of London.
Bakerloo - serves Baker Street and Waterloo, but extends to a considerable direction north-westwards and a short distance the other way.
Victoria - certainly serves Victoria, but so do two other Tube lines and a host of surface lines.
Piccadilly - serves Piccadilly Circus, but so does the Bakerloo.
Jubilee - didn't open in the Silver Jubilee year as planned. (Had it not been for the Millennium Dome, the extension might well not have opened in time for the Golden Jubilee, 25 years later.)
District - well I can't deny that it serves many districts of London, but so do all the other lines!
Which only leaves:
Waterloo & City. Does exactly what it says on the tin. And it wasn't even a Tube line until 1994!
Metropolitan - goes right out into the suburbs and further into Buckinghamshire.
Central - extends far beyond central London, to Essex in one direction and into suburban west London in the other direction.
Circle - no longer runs in a circle.
Northern - extends further south than any other Tube line.
Hammersmith & City - one end is indeed at Hammersmith, but the other isn't in the City of London.
Bakerloo - serves Baker Street and Waterloo, but extends to a considerable direction north-westwards and a short distance the other way.
Victoria - certainly serves Victoria, but so do two other Tube lines and a host of surface lines.
Piccadilly - serves Piccadilly Circus, but so does the Bakerloo.
Jubilee - didn't open in the Silver Jubilee year as planned. (Had it not been for the Millennium Dome, the extension might well not have opened in time for the Golden Jubilee, 25 years later.)
District - well I can't deny that it serves many districts of London, but so do all the other lines!
Which only leaves:
Waterloo & City. Does exactly what it says on the tin. And it wasn't even a Tube line until 1994!
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
- tubeguru
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 9100
- Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 22:08
- Location: The Twilight Zone
- Contact:
Re: Naming of lines
I'm not even sure where to start with this. Most of the lines you've mentioned have names that are perfectly sensible. A history of certain lines should be read to see why their names were chosen (the Piccadilly, for example). I can pick holes with every one of your "complaints".
One thing only do I know, and that is that I know nothing - Socrates.
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2022
Member of sweet FA
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2022
Member of sweet FA
-
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 5464
- Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24
Re: Naming of lines
I know why the names were chosen historically. I'm saying they don't make much sense now.tubeguru wrote:I'm not even sure where to start with this. Most of the lines you've mentioned have names that are perfectly sensible. A history of certain lines should be read to see why their names were chosen (the Piccadilly, for example). I can pick holes with every one of your "complaints".
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
- tubeguru
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 9100
- Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 22:08
- Location: The Twilight Zone
- Contact:
Re: Naming of lines
Yes, but renaming them now would be a hugely expensive and pointless exercise.
One thing only do I know, and that is that I know nothing - Socrates.
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2022
Member of sweet FA
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2022
Member of sweet FA
-
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 5464
- Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24
Re: Naming of lines
They did it with the Hammersmith and City line, didn't they? It was part of the Metropolitan line when I was a kid. And they renamed a big chunk of the Bakerloo as the Jubilee.
EDIT: Oh, and the East London line as well. That was the "Metropolitan line (East London section)".
EDIT (2): And within the last few weeks they've just renamed a whole load of lines from "Abellio Greater Anglia" to "London Overground", or in one case "Tfl Rail". Was that hugely expensive and pointless as well? (Maybe it was.)
EDIT: Oh, and the East London line as well. That was the "Metropolitan line (East London section)".
EDIT (2): And within the last few weeks they've just renamed a whole load of lines from "Abellio Greater Anglia" to "London Overground", or in one case "Tfl Rail". Was that hugely expensive and pointless as well? (Maybe it was.)
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
-
- All Zones
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: 17 Apr 2006, 16:45
- Location: Zone 900
Re: Naming of lines
Circle goes anti-clockwise in a circle from Edgware Rd to Edgware Rd so still correct.
26 miles 385yards in 4h 14m 40s.
- RobbieM
- All Zones
- Posts: 2637
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 21:14
- Location: Guildford
Re: Naming of lines
And then, of course, most of the Underground is Overground, and some of the Overground will be found Underground...
Personal record: 270 Stations in 9 minutes and 3 seconds
-
- Zone 3
- Posts: 116
- Joined: 07 May 2013, 17:37
- Location: Colchester
Re: Naming of lines
every time i hear underground and overground in the same sentence i always think of this...RobbieM wrote:And then, of course, most of the Underground is Overground, and some of the Overground will be found Underground...
https://youtu.be/XWQMMPFtoG4?t=15s
Best FNC time
18:10:37
18:10:37
-
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 5464
- Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24
Re: Naming of lines
Right, I'm going to have a rant about this. Most of the names can be justified on the grounds that they're shortened versions of the names of the companies that originally built the lines. But not the Victoria line, which was purpose-built in the 1960s. They could have picked any name they wanted for the line (one suggestion I liked was "Viking", from VIctoria and KING's Cross). So why did they pick the most confusing name possible?
To me, the "Victoria line" should mean "the line to Victoria". Imagine standing at Clapham Junction and wanting to go into London. You might say "shall I take the Waterloo line or the Victoria line?" I know that it once terminated at Victoria but I think there were always plans to extend it further south. You might as well call it the King's Cross line or the Oxford Circus line. It must be confusing to visitors:
"How do I get from Oxford Circus to King's Cross?"
"You need the Victoria line."
"But I'm not going to Victoria."
You see what I mean?
To me, the "Victoria line" should mean "the line to Victoria". Imagine standing at Clapham Junction and wanting to go into London. You might say "shall I take the Waterloo line or the Victoria line?" I know that it once terminated at Victoria but I think there were always plans to extend it further south. You might as well call it the King's Cross line or the Oxford Circus line. It must be confusing to visitors:
"How do I get from Oxford Circus to King's Cross?"
"You need the Victoria line."
"But I'm not going to Victoria."
You see what I mean?
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
- Iain
- All Zones
- Posts: 2155
- Joined: 11 Nov 2011, 11:26
- Location: Sutton
Re: Naming of lines
No, I don't. By your logic each line would have to be renamed according to where each person wants to go - which could be any one of the multiple stations on the line. Even if you limit it to end points for each line, you still have two names for the Victoria, and six for the District. How you think that is simpler is beyond me!GuyBarry wrote:
"How do I get from Oxford Circus to King's Cross?"
"You need the Victoria line."
"But I'm not going to Victoria."
You see what I mean?
Full Network: Three completions, Best time: 17:18:18 - thanks Glen, Andrew and Rhys!
Former DLR 45 station record holder (with Glen, Andi and Stevo) - 2h:08m:57s
All lines: 46:11 (6th equal)
Zone One 2:52:51 (thanks Glen)
Former DLR 45 station record holder (with Glen, Andi and Stevo) - 2h:08m:57s
All lines: 46:11 (6th equal)
Zone One 2:52:51 (thanks Glen)
-
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 5464
- Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24
Re: Naming of lines
I'm not saying that at all. I'm just saying that the name "Victoria line" is potentially confusing for people who don't know London very well.Iain wrote:No, I don't. By your logic each line would have to be renamed according to where each person wants to go - which could be any one of the multiple stations on the line.GuyBarry wrote:
"How do I get from Oxford Circus to King's Cross?"
"You need the Victoria line."
"But I'm not going to Victoria."
You see what I mean?
Normally, if a railway line is named after a single station on it, that station is the terminus. For instance in Bristol there's a line called the "Severn Beach line", because it terminates at Severn Beach. I suppose they could have named it after one of the intermediate stations and called it the "Clifton Down line", but that would have suggested that Clifton Down was the end of the line.
The only example I can think of where lines are named after an intermediate station is when there are alternative routes to the same destination. For instance, you can travel from Charing Cross to Dartford via the "Greenwich line", the "Bexleyheath line" or the "Sidcup line". In each case a single station was chosen that uniquely identifies the route.
But that doesn't really apply to the Victoria line either. I suppose you could argue that if I'm going from Euston to Stockwell, I can travel either on the Northern line or via Victoria, so perhaps the name can be justified that way. But on those grounds the Northern line would have to be called something like the "Charing Cross line" or the "Bank line", depending on which way you're going.
It's just an annoying anomaly in my view. No one's going to change the name now, but I wish they'd picked a better one in the first place.
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
-
- Zone 6
- Posts: 975
- Joined: 04 Jun 2013, 10:42
- Location: South of the Thames
Re: Naming of lines
But this is exactly what does happen. The terms "Charing Cross branch" and "Bank branch" are in common use on the Northern line, and trains are described with phrases like "this is a Northern line train to Edgware via Bank."GuyBarry wrote:But on those grounds the Northern line would have to be called something like the "Charing Cross line" or the "Bank line", depending on which way you're going.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/24772733@N05/5749901323
Royal Oak to Bethnal Green in 333 days
Heathrow Terminal 4 to Amersham in 17 hours, 42 minutes and 22 seconds
Heathrow Terminal 4 to Amersham in 17 hours, 42 minutes and 22 seconds
-
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 5464
- Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24
Re: Naming of lines
The name of the line doesn't change though, does it? Anyway, I've made my point. Feel free to disagree.
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
- Iain
- All Zones
- Posts: 2155
- Joined: 11 Nov 2011, 11:26
- Location: Sutton
Re: Naming of lines
If you're not saying that the line has to be named after each traveller's destination, then what was the point of this quote?
Whatever you name a line, let's say X, then a big chunk of travellers can say "But I'm not going to X". Unless of course you named the Victoria line "The Brixton, Stockwell, Vauxhall, Pimlico, Victoria, Green Park ... Blackhorse Road and Walthamstow line"GuyBarry wrote:
"How do I get from Oxford Circus to King's Cross?"
"You need the Victoria line."
"But I'm not going to Victoria."
Full Network: Three completions, Best time: 17:18:18 - thanks Glen, Andrew and Rhys!
Former DLR 45 station record holder (with Glen, Andi and Stevo) - 2h:08m:57s
All lines: 46:11 (6th equal)
Zone One 2:52:51 (thanks Glen)
Former DLR 45 station record holder (with Glen, Andi and Stevo) - 2h:08m:57s
All lines: 46:11 (6th equal)
Zone One 2:52:51 (thanks Glen)
-
- The Twilight Zone
- Posts: 5464
- Joined: 01 Aug 2011, 09:24
Re: Naming of lines
The point was that it might be conceivably be misleading to travellers who haven't spent years going round the London Underground. I appreciate that it might be difficult for some people on this forum to obtain that perspective.Iain wrote:If you're not saying that the line has to be named after each traveller's destination, then what was the point of this quote?
GuyBarry wrote:
"How do I get from Oxford Circus to King's Cross?"
"You need the Victoria line."
"But I'm not going to Victoria."
Undefeated Tumbleweed champion, Oct 2015
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
Inventor of Grumbleweed, Nimbleweed, Timesnap, Postsnap and several other silly games
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests