Do you mean ageofftech wrote:yes, but don't worry. there'll be another Episode along in minute ...
The Tube - episode 3
- Steeevooo
- All Zones
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: 14 Jul 2005, 12:23
- Location: Rainham, Essex
Re: The Tube - episode 3
-
- Zone 1
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 17:06
Re: The Tube - episode 3
What do you mean in minute? The next episode is Monday.geofftech wrote:yes, but don't worry. there'll be another Episode along in minute ...
-
- Zone 1
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 17:06
Re: The Tube - episode 3
You can say that. Who's going to bring up the chat for episode 4?tubeguru wrote:I assume that all chat relating to episode three of The Tube is exhausted?
- tubeguru
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 9100
- Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 22:08
- Location: The Twilight Zone
- Contact:
Re: The Tube - episode 3
I don't know. I can't see into the future.
One thing only do I know, and that is that I know nothing - Socrates.
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2022
Member of sweet FA
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2022
Member of sweet FA
-
- All Zones
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: 03 Feb 2005, 20:35
- Contact:
Re: The Tube - episode 3
i'll start a thread for Episode 4, for sure. although having said that i'll be out on Monday evening so will have to watch it iPlayer-styli when i return home...
interesting that you mention the 1-minutes though. i've got quite a few timings in my app now for when the board says "1 minute", how long the trains actually takes to arrive and come to a stand still. the average is 1 minute, 27 seconds - with Central line trains being the worst, where a 1 minute usually means between 1m40s and 1m50s ...
interesting that you mention the 1-minutes though. i've got quite a few timings in my app now for when the board says "1 minute", how long the trains actually takes to arrive and come to a stand still. the average is 1 minute, 27 seconds - with Central line trains being the worst, where a 1 minute usually means between 1m40s and 1m50s ...
-
- Zone 1
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 17:06
Re: The Tube - episode 3
geofftech wrote:i'll start a thread for Episode 4, for sure. although having said that i'll be out on Monday evening so will have to watch it iPlayer-styli when i return home...
interesting that you mention the 1-minutes though. i've got quite a few timings in my app now for when the board says "1 minute", how long the trains actually takes to arrive and come to a stand still. the average is 1 minute, 27 seconds - with Central line trains being the worst, where a 1 minute usually means between 1m40s and 1m50s ...
I thought Piccadilly Line trains were the worst in minutes, you said so in your report of your 17th time doing the challenge.
- greatkingrat
- All Zones
- Posts: 2544
- Joined: 11 Feb 2005, 00:35
Re: The Tube - episode 3
"1 minute" could mean anywhere between 1:00 and 1:59 until the train arrives
Soon to be yet another forum train driver
- tubeguru
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 9100
- Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 22:08
- Location: The Twilight Zone
- Contact:
Re: The Tube - episode 3
Do you take everything everyone says at face value, and to be the absolute truth?hakc97 wrote:geofftech wrote:i'll start a thread for Episode 4, for sure. although having said that i'll be out on Monday evening so will have to watch it iPlayer-styli when i return home...
interesting that you mention the 1-minutes though. i've got quite a few timings in my app now for when the board says "1 minute", how long the trains actually takes to arrive and come to a stand still. the average is 1 minute, 27 seconds - with Central line trains being the worst, where a 1 minute usually means between 1m40s and 1m50s ...
I thought Piccadilly Line trains were the worst in minutes, you said so in your report of your 17th time doing the challenge.
One thing only do I know, and that is that I know nothing - Socrates.
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2022
Member of sweet FA
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2022
Member of sweet FA
-
- All Zones
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: 03 Feb 2005, 20:35
- Contact:
Re: The Tube - episode 3
why? to me 1 minute should mean "No more than 1 minute", "1 minute or less".greatkingrat wrote:"1 minute" could mean anywhere between 1:00 and 1:59 until the train arrives
-
- Zone 1
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 17:06
Re: The Tube - episode 3
Not alwaystubeguru wrote: Do you take everything everyone says at face value, and to be the absolute truth?
-
- All Zones
- Posts: 1398
- Joined: 15 Jul 2011, 16:28
Re: The Tube - episode 3
So what do you describe 1:30 as? It's clearly not 2 minutes.geofftech wrote:why? to me 1 minute should mean "No more than 1 minute", "1 minute or less".greatkingrat wrote:"1 minute" could mean anywhere between 1:00 and 1:59 until the train arrives
1 FNC Completion (PB: 17:18:18 with G Bryant, A Chilcraft, I MacNaughton)
4 Zone Ones (PB: 03:00:35 with G Bryant)
15 R15s (PB: 01:55:48 with T Cooling and R Jackson)
11 All Lines (PB: 00:44:03)
Winner of the 2014 Formula 1 Side Competition
4 Zone Ones (PB: 03:00:35 with G Bryant)
15 R15s (PB: 01:55:48 with T Cooling and R Jackson)
11 All Lines (PB: 00:44:03)
Winner of the 2014 Formula 1 Side Competition
- Iain
- All Zones
- Posts: 2155
- Joined: 11 Nov 2011, 11:26
- Location: Sutton
Re: The Tube - episode 3
I guess this just shows how widely opinions can differ on this subject. If I was forced to pin down my answer I'd say something along the lines of 1 minute is somewhere between 30 seconds and 1 minute 29 seconds. So while HT sees 1:30 as "clearly not two minutes", to me it's an entirely reasonable answer.
Full Network: Three completions, Best time: 17:18:18 - thanks Glen, Andrew and Rhys!
Former DLR 45 station record holder (with Glen, Andi and Stevo) - 2h:08m:57s
All lines: 46:11 (6th equal)
Zone One 2:52:51 (thanks Glen)
Former DLR 45 station record holder (with Glen, Andi and Stevo) - 2h:08m:57s
All lines: 46:11 (6th equal)
Zone One 2:52:51 (thanks Glen)
- Steeevooo
- All Zones
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: 14 Jul 2005, 12:23
- Location: Rainham, Essex
Re: The Tube - episode 3
To me, the time shown on the board should mean to within the time shown, i.e. if it shows 2 minutes, then it should arrive within two minutes.
-
- Zone 2
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 26 Oct 2011, 20:00
Re: The Tube - episode 3
The problem with displaying a maximum waiting time is that the boards woud still be showing 1 min as the train pulled into the station, which could be annoying for someone standing at the bottom of the stairs at Campden deciding which train to go for (or a Tube Challenger having a quick toilet stop!)
Iain's suggestion of using 1 minute to signifiy 00:31 to 01:30 seems the most logical, because in theory it is a maximum of 30 seconds out, whereas with either of the other two conventions there is a possibility of a 59 second discrepancy.
What drives the system? I've always assumed its the track circuits, in which case the times must be very approximate. Perhaps they shold display next trains in terms of distance rather than time (although that wouldn't work for terminal stations!)
Iain's suggestion of using 1 minute to signifiy 00:31 to 01:30 seems the most logical, because in theory it is a maximum of 30 seconds out, whereas with either of the other two conventions there is a possibility of a 59 second discrepancy.
What drives the system? I've always assumed its the track circuits, in which case the times must be very approximate. Perhaps they shold display next trains in terms of distance rather than time (although that wouldn't work for terminal stations!)
Metrolink 91 stations 6:27:01
FNC: 18:48:00
FNC: 18:48:00
- Root
- All Zones
- Posts: 2401
- Joined: 07 Mar 2006, 02:28
- Location: Helsinki, Finland
- Contact:
Re: The Tube - episode 3
So, what about when it shows 0 minutes?Steeevooo wrote:To me, the time shown on the board should mean to within the time shown, i.e. if it shows 2 minutes, then it should arrive within two minutes.
I agree with Iain and Cheshire Cat.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests