Mornington Crescent - GAME 2
-
- Zone 4
- Posts: 264
- Joined: 03 Aug 2005, 01:52
- Location: Edmonton, North London, UK
- TheFatBuoy
- Zone 5
- Posts: 504
- Joined: 23 Aug 2005, 21:03
- Location: Location, Location
- hwolge
- Zone 6
- Posts: 856
- Joined: 22 Feb 2005, 14:28
- Location: Malmö, Sweden
- TheFatBuoy
- Zone 5
- Posts: 504
- Joined: 23 Aug 2005, 21:03
- Location: Location, Location
- zeibura
- Zone 5
- Posts: 647
- Joined: 05 Feb 2005, 10:18
- Location: Žižkov
- Contact:
- TheFatBuoy
- Zone 5
- Posts: 504
- Joined: 23 Aug 2005, 21:03
- Location: Location, Location
-
- Zone 4
- Posts: 264
- Joined: 03 Aug 2005, 01:52
- Location: Edmonton, North London, UK
You can utter MC all you like, it won't get you anywhere though, as a lot of stations haven't been played yet, putting you well and truly in knip and netting you three penalty tokens in the process (for lying, cheating and taking MC's name in vain).
With that in mind, I'm gonna head from West Ham down to:
SOUTHWARK (for Waterloo East)
With that in mind, I'm gonna head from West Ham down to:
SOUTHWARK (for Waterloo East)
- TheFatBuoy
- Zone 5
- Posts: 504
- Joined: 23 Aug 2005, 21:03
- Location: Location, Location
Well seeing as actually explaining what on earth this is all about never seems to happen, and that there are more sets of rules than houses in London, I'm just going to use the "Fat Boy 2005 Light Speed" rules, hi-jack the neccessary trains, get them to go around all remaining stations in double-quick time, and within literally seconds:barrykas wrote:You can utter MC all you like, it won't get you anywhere though, as a lot of stations haven't been played yet, putting you well and truly in knip and netting you three penalty tokens in the process (for lying, cheating and taking MC's name in vain).
With that in mind, I'm gonna head from West Ham down to:
SOUTHWARK (for Waterloo East)
MORNINGTON CRESCENT!
-
- Zone 1
- Posts: 39
- Joined: 12 Sep 2005, 11:06
- Location: Adelaide, Australia (but Wood Green 40 years ago)
Well now... such a play MIGHT be allowable if:
(a) The lines were all physically connected to each other (which they're not), and
(b) There weren't any rolling stock size restrictions on some of the lines (which there are)
SO the hi-jack has to be rendered as an invalid move under the Sixth Strzlecki Addendum, with a further penalty of 5 tokens applying, and so I shall proceed to:
EMBANKMENT
(a) The lines were all physically connected to each other (which they're not), and
(b) There weren't any rolling stock size restrictions on some of the lines (which there are)
SO the hi-jack has to be rendered as an invalid move under the Sixth Strzlecki Addendum, with a further penalty of 5 tokens applying, and so I shall proceed to:
EMBANKMENT
It's one for you, nineteen for me, 'cause I'm a ....
- TheFatBuoy
- Zone 5
- Posts: 504
- Joined: 23 Aug 2005, 21:03
- Location: Location, Location
- CrunchySaviour
- All Zones
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: 14 Feb 2005, 19:18
- Location: Bedfordshire
- Contact:
Performing a swift Tic-Tac off the Zone 1 "Elephant", I will move post haste to
WEST HARROW
redeeming all tokens from the centre of the map caused by repeated Mornington utterances.
WEST HARROW
redeeming all tokens from the centre of the map caused by repeated Mornington utterances.
~ Let loose the bands of war! DISINTEGRATOR.co.uk
- TheFatBuoy
- Zone 5
- Posts: 504
- Joined: 23 Aug 2005, 21:03
- Location: Location, Location
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests