Page 5 of 15

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 07 Jun 2013, 14:38
by geofftech
thanks Nigel, shouldn't my latest time be in third place though, not fourth?

also - who was the 13 year old kid a while back to reportedly have done it - did we get any more info from him?

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 07 Jun 2013, 14:50
by tractakid
Surely 16:39 is slower than 16:38? :)

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 07 Jun 2013, 19:54
by Nigel
geofftech wrote:thanks Nigel, shouldn't my latest time be in third place though, not fourth?
No.
geofftech wrote:also - who was the 13 year old kid a while back to reportedly have done it - did we get any more info from him?
I tried contacting him via the other forum where he posted, but got no response - I don't have full details or a name, so couldn't include him in the list.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 14 Aug 2013, 00:25
by nozzacook
Kevin and I are disappointed at not breaking the 17 hour mark which was well on untill the last couple of changes.

Our time was 17hours 11mins 49sec. A new PB for Kevin.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 14 Aug 2013, 01:53
by Iain
We had a similar story - we looked like we'd get sub 17 too and stumbled upon what should have been a 1 min onto a Ken O train, but the District line really cost us dear then and on the next few changes. We ended up with 17:18:18, a new PB for Glen, Andrew and myself and gave Rhys his first completion

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 14 Aug 2013, 16:44
by Nigel
Top times on first page of this thread updated with results of the August Tube Race. As before, as these are they most recent, they are shown in bold.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 14 Aug 2013, 16:52
by tractakid
I met someone on the RailUK challenge who apparently knows 'Trainboy98', so I asked him if he could find out anything about this mystery attempt.

Thanks for updating with yesterday's times.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 14 Aug 2013, 23:52
by Iain
The Ians have finished in 18:14 - no details of seconds yet

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 14 Aug 2013, 23:57
by Sam
I need to get back out on the network before I get knocked out of the top 10!!! :?

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 15 Aug 2013, 09:29
by Nigel
List on first page updated for the two Ians. I will try to contact them to get more info and invite them to join the forum

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 15 Aug 2013, 11:47
by Iain
Ah, their iPad which they were using to time it died so they don't know

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 15 Aug 2013, 12:09
by palkanetoijala31
Sam wrote:I need to get back out on the network before I get knocked out of the top 10!!! :?
I believe you actually have been knocked out of top ten to 11th place although i can neither confirm the date or time of this attempt took place and no its not a ******** 1 or 2 attempt.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 15 Aug 2013, 12:31
by tractakid
palkanetoijala31 wrote:
Sam wrote:I need to get back out on the network before I get knocked out of the top 10!!! :?
I believe you actually have been knocked out of top ten to 11th place although i can neither confirm the date or time of this attempt took place and no its not a ******** 1 or 2 attempt.
Sam is in the top ten until someone publicly announces a faster time. I disagree with the concept of keeping times secret, and I hope that the attempt you mention is now revealed properly and fully.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 15 Aug 2013, 12:35
by Sam
palkanetoijala31 wrote:
Sam wrote:I need to get back out on the network before I get knocked out of the top 10!!! :?
I believe you actually have been knocked out of top ten to 11th place although i can neither confirm the date or time of this attempt took place and no its not a ******** 1 or 2 attempt.

Well until that so called attempt is confirmed then I am in the top 10.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 15 Aug 2013, 20:46
by Sam
Oh let me guess, it must be the elusive Adham Fisher. Well I'll take that with a pinch of salt :)