Page 2 of 15

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 22 Dec 2011, 11:51
by palkanetoijala31
come on myles top 40 is yours if nobody completes before you

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 16:28
by greatkingrat
New record for the slowest ever attempt? :D

http://diamondgeezer.blogspot.com/2011/ ... lenge.html

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 16:47
by Iain
What's with the 269 stations?

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:00
by The Raven
Iain wrote:What's with the 269 stations?
I assume he's not counting Blackfrairs which has been closed all year. I wonder how many people, in total have indeed been to every station....

My guess is about 100 or so tube challengers (people how have attempted the record), few thousand bored Londoners, and tens of thousands of LU staff

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:15
by tubeguru
The Raven wrote:
Iain wrote:What's with the 269 stations?
My guess is ... tens of thousands of LU staff
Why would tens of thousands of tube staff have been to every station?

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 17:20
by tractakid
I recon your numbers are hugely overestimated! Honestly, who, apart from the local and/or insane people, wants to go to Mill Hill East?

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 01 Jan 2012, 14:40
by The Raven
tubeguru wrote:
The Raven wrote:
Iain wrote:What's with the 269 stations?
My guess is ... tens of thousands of LU staff
Why would tens of thousands of tube staff have been to every station?
Your right, thinking about it the average LU staff member is unlikely to visit ALL the London Underground stations.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 01 Jan 2012, 15:05
by Nigel
greatkingrat wrote:New record for the slowest ever attempt? :D

http://diamondgeezer.blogspot.com/2011/ ... lenge.html
But it would only be a valid time if he didn't travel anywhere by car, taxi, bike or other non-scheduled transport throughout the year. But knowing DG, he probably didn't :) .

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 14 May 2012, 12:17
by Rhys1995
Are we doing almost completions as well or not bothering? If so, I've got a new PB, 246 in 16 hours 10 minutes and 22.1 seconds (being precise there :wink: )

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 14 May 2012, 12:55
by Nigel
Rhys1995 wrote:Are we doing almost completions as well or not bothering? If so, I've got a new PB, 246 in 16 hours 10 minutes and 22.1 seconds (being precise there :wink: )
I've only got data on completions, so that's what I'm showing in the table at the start of this thread. I know that there are some completions which those involved have chosen not to divulge, so even this data is incomplete.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 19 May 2012, 08:37
by Nigel
List at top of the thread updated with Glen & Iain's time for 18/5/2012

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 19 May 2012, 17:48
by The Raven
Here's a graph containing all of the completion times of the current configuration against time. Red dots indicate world record times.

Image

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 19 May 2012, 17:54
by tubeguru
Can you produce that with time as the X axis?

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 19 May 2012, 19:05
by tractakid
Make it interactive so that we can hover over a dot to see who it is! :P

Seriously though, nice graph, but any correlation is extremely weak.

Re: Top times: Full Network Challenge

Posted: 23 May 2012, 18:50
by Urzzz1871
Well up to January this year there is a pretty solid correlation.

However, this year seems to have put a spanner in the works somewhat.

Which is really strange as we all know the service now is much more reliable than it has ever been. :roll: