tubechallenge.com

Because of the abysmal editing of this page and the complete refusal to accept anything aside the full network as "Tube Challenge" I hadn't looked at the wiki page for many, many years but my oh my has it has gone downhill further not even listing the full history of GWR holders....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tube_Challenge

This used to be so, so good detailing all the alternative challenges and explaining them as well and now even the full network history is not documented....

Wikipedia apparently won't allow record times to be listed unless there is a reference for them (i.e. the Guinness Book of Records).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnGRMkfFJuE

RJSRdg wrote: ↑06 Jun 2017, 00:45 Wikipedia apparently won't allow record times to be listed unless there is a reference for them (i.e. the Guinness Book of Records).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnGRMkfFJuE

Wikipedia is an illegal unnaccountable organisation which constantly breaks their own rules. until they actually check references which they don't until they do that the page will be stagnant. die Wikipedia die.

RJSRdg wrote: ↑06 Jun 2017, 00:45 Wikipedia apparently won't allow record times to be listed unless there is a reference for them (i.e. the Guinness Book of Records).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnGRMkfFJuE

But at the time all of them would have been on the website. Is there a way to check on a site that has pictures of loads of days of that website?

Tube Geek wrote: ↑06 Jun 2017, 07:31

RJSRdg wrote: ↑06 Jun 2017, 00:45 Wikipedia apparently won't allow record times to be listed unless there is a reference for them (i.e. the Guinness Book of Records).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnGRMkfFJuE

But at the time all of them would have been on the website. Is there a way to check on a site that has pictures of loads of days of that website?

I do not wish to appear UDNWPW (user does not wish publish Wikipedia) due to the afformentioned above.

dstock17 wrote: ↑06 Jun 2017, 06:58

RJSRdg wrote: ↑06 Jun 2017, 00:45 Wikipedia apparently won't allow record times to be listed unless there is a reference for them (i.e. the Guinness Book of Records).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnGRMkfFJuE

Wikipedia is an illegal unnaccountable organisation which constantly breaks their own rules. until they actually check references which they don't until they do that the page will be stagnant. die Wikipedia die.

Andi ?!?

michael_churchill wrote: ↑06 Jun 2017, 11:42

dstock17 wrote: ↑06 Jun 2017, 06:58

RJSRdg wrote: ↑06 Jun 2017, 00:45 Wikipedia apparently won't allow record times to be listed unless there is a reference for them (i.e. the Guinness Book of Records).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnGRMkfFJuE

Wikipedia is an illegal unnaccountable organisation which constantly breaks their own rules. until they actually check references which they don't until they do that the page will be stagnant. die Wikipedia die.

Andi ?!?

THAT'S who dstock reminded me of!

Interestingly enough a celebrity backer has now confirmed that Wikipedia is an illegal organisation
. Tyson fury the boxer is banned from Wikipedia after changing his own profile from retired back to active. Scum Wikipedia kept changing back to retired. Now how is it that the person themselves can get barred from changing the truth.

If everybody stops using this scumbag site it soon fall I asked in the subway challenge that they change the wording of challengers to simple challenger Glen Bryant read about the challenge from reading Wikipedia which is what the source says. You can't believe these illegal Wikipedia editors and the bullshit they come up with.

illegal

State the law

crypto wrote: ↑09 Nov 2018, 12:21

illegal

State the law

When a website believes that they can print what they like from any source despite that source being incorrect Wikipedia refuses to admit blame when they are wrong hence tyson fury is he retired. No he has come back when a site publishes mistruths that is illegal. Against copyright law.