Elizabeth Line
Posted: 28 Apr 2016, 12:01
I was recently talking to a TFL member of staff who seemed to think that the central part of "Crossrail" would be classified as a tube line. Does anyone have any info on this?
Wouldn't Uxbridge be closer than Amersham?The Orange One wrote:Reading start anyone? And don't forget the Slough to Amersham run, and while you're at it the Shenfield to Ongar run as well...
I would agree that this appears likely.nozzacook wrote:It's not operated by LU. So would not be required for the record.
And Acton Main Line would be the only station not served by LU trains as well anyway, so there wouldn't be much point in using itmoley wrote:I would agree that this appears likely.nozzacook wrote:It's not operated by LU. So would not be required for the record.
How on earth did you dream this one up?Tube Geek wrote:And Acton Main Line would be the only station not served by LU trains as well anyway, so there wouldn't be much point in using itmoley wrote:I would agree that this appears likely.nozzacook wrote:It's not operated by LU. So would not be required for the record.
What do you mean?The Orange One wrote:How on earth did you dream this one up?Tube Geek wrote:And Acton Main Line would be the only station not served by LU trains as well anyway, so there wouldn't be much point in using itmoley wrote:I would agree that this appears likely.nozzacook wrote:It's not operated by LU. So would not be required for the record.
But the original post in this topic only said the central section, and I don't think think Reading is centralThe Orange One wrote:There's either 30 or 32 stations on the Crossrail route not served by LU (depending how you count the Heathrows) so I don't see how you can reduce this figure down to 1!!
That's what I was confused about in the first place! That's like saying only Stratford to White City on the Central Line is a Tube line!The Orange One wrote: And how can you say part of the line is a tube line and the rest isn't?