BBC News online article
-
- Zone 5
- Posts: 640
- Joined: 06 Jan 2008, 19:04
- Location: Woodford
BBC News online article
Last of the 'collectors' mentioned here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34196204
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34196204
Re: BBC News online article
Interesting again that no mention of the people again who are better and faster but then again BBC and Guinness don't like Steve and myself
- moley
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 1906
- Joined: 07 May 2005, 13:38
- Location: Portsmouth
- Contact:
Re: BBC News online article
Yes - they have skipped two sets of records!
Tube Forum administrator. I look after the database to keep this place running smoothly.
Re: BBC News online article
Now that wikipedia has also declared war on mr james plus bbc and Guinness world records mark my words I will cause hell
- tubeguru
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 9100
- Joined: 30 Jan 2005, 22:08
- Location: The Twilight Zone
- Contact:
Re: BBC News online article
Bear in mind that Wikipedia will only show factually-proven information. If your record attempt is not recognised by Guinness then it won't, and can't, appear on Wikipedia.palkanetoijala31 wrote:Now that wikipedia has also declared war on mr james plus bbc and Guinness world records mark my words I will cause hell
One thing only do I know, and that is that I know nothing - Socrates.
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2022
Member of sweet FA
Champion of bugger all, 2004 to 2022
Member of sweet FA
Re: BBC News online article
True but they also won't get access to print my previous records if don't allow they made the war I will not allow my name to be printed if the fastest time is not ratified Guinness made war BBC made war I will fight I will wintubeguru wrote:Bear in mind that Wikipedia will only show factually-proven information. If your record attempt is not recognised by Guinness then it won't, and can't, appear on Wikipedia.palkanetoijala31 wrote:Now that wikipedia has also declared war on mr james plus bbc and Guinness world records mark my words I will cause hell
Re: BBC News online article
and so Wikipedia don't change make legal threats against them for illegal edits and hey ho ur banned freedom of speech is dead u not allowed to know the truth bbc ur not allowed to know the name of andy james.
every comment of any tube challenge page will now be be vandalised by myself until the truth is spoken!
every comment of any tube challenge page will now be be vandalised by myself until the truth is spoken!
-
- All Zones
- Posts: 1227
- Joined: 16 Mar 2015, 00:35
Re: BBC News online article
Surely that depends on how the entry is worded. For example "On ??/??/2015 Andy James and ???? claimed a new record of 15:45, however this was rejected by Guinness" would be factual information.tubeguru wrote:Bear in mind that Wikipedia will only show factually-proven information. If your record attempt is not recognised by Guinness then it won't, and can't, appear on Wikipedia.palkanetoijala31 wrote:Now that wikipedia has also declared war on mr james plus bbc and Guinness world records mark my words I will cause hell
272 stations in 18:30:32
The only person to have used a boat in a Random 15 Challenge!
The only person to have used a boat in a Random 15 Challenge!
- greatkingrat
- All Zones
- Posts: 2544
- Joined: 11 Feb 2005, 00:35
Re: BBC News online article
Only if you have a reliable source to back it up. Otherwise you could equally add W*veform claiming to have broken the record in 13:26 or something.
Soon to be yet another forum train driver
Re: BBC News online article
But if they do not allow the truth I will delete my history from it its what about is right not from their guidelines which quite frankly are over zealous trumped up little ******* u can't contact people either the minute u make threats they shut down no freedom of speech. No chance of people making any alterations now hope the page burns in hell I will now discredit any comments on any other pages tube wise about any former record holder until the truth is made knowngreatkingrat wrote:Only if you have a reliable source to back it up. Otherwise you could equally add W*veform claiming to have broken the record in 13:26 or something.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests